Color for Philosophers

Color for Philosophers
Author :
Publisher : Hackett Publishing
Total Pages : 300
Release :
ISBN-10 : 0872200396
ISBN-13 : 9780872200395
Rating : 4/5 (395 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Color for Philosophers by : C. L. Hardin

Download or read book Color for Philosophers written by C. L. Hardin and published by Hackett Publishing. This book was released on 1988-01-01 with total page 300 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Awarded the 1986 Johnsonian Prize in Philosophy. This work on colour features a chapter, 'Further Thoughts: 1993', in which the author revisits the dispute between colour objectivists and subjectivists from the perspective of the ecology, genetics, and evolution of colour vision.


Color for Philosophers Related Books

Color for Philosophers
Language: en
Pages: 300
Authors: C. L. Hardin
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 1988-01-01 - Publisher: Hackett Publishing

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Awarded the 1986 Johnsonian Prize in Philosophy. This work on colour features a chapter, 'Further Thoughts: 1993', in which the author revisits the dispute betw
Readings on Color: The philosophy of color
Language: en
Pages: 354
Authors: Alex Byrne
Categories: Color
Type: BOOK - Published: 1997 - Publisher: MIT Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Outside Color
Language: en
Pages: 267
Authors: M. Chirimuuta
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2017-07-28 - Publisher: MIT Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

An integrated study of the history, philosophy, and science of color that offers a novel theory of the metaphysics of color. Is color real or illusory, mind ind
Readings on color
Language: en
Pages: 465
Authors: Alex Byrne
Categories:
Type: BOOK - Published: 1997 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Color and Consciousness
Language: en
Pages: 135
Authors: Charles Landesman
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 1989 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Charles Landesman deals with the philosophical problems of perception and with the status of color properties and he comes to the surprising conclusion that not