Arguments for a Non-Transformational Grammar

Arguments for a Non-Transformational Grammar
Author :
Publisher : University of Chicago Press
Total Pages : 228
Release :
ISBN-10 : 0226357996
ISBN-13 : 9780226357997
Rating : 4/5 (997 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Arguments for a Non-Transformational Grammar by : Richard A. Hudson

Download or read book Arguments for a Non-Transformational Grammar written by Richard A. Hudson and published by University of Chicago Press. This book was released on 1976-11 with total page 228 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: For the past decade, the dominant transformational theory of syntax has produced the most interesting insights into syntactic properties. Over the same period another theory, systemic grammar, has been developed very quietly as an alternative to the transformational model. In this work Richard A. Hudson outlines "daughter-dependency theory," which is derived from systemic grammar, and offers empirical reasons for preferring it to any version of transformational grammar. The goal of daughter-dependency theory is the same as that of Chomskyan transformational grammar—to generate syntactic structures for all (and only) syntactically well-formed sentences that would relate to both the phonological and the semantic structures of the sentences. However, unlike transformational grammars, those based on daughter-dependency theory generate a single syntactic structure for each sentence. This structure incorporates all the kinds of information that are spread, in a transformational grammar, over to a series of structures (deep, surface, and intermediate). Instead of the combination of phrase-structure rules and transformations found in transformational grammars, daughter-dependency grammars contain rules with the following functions: classification, dependency-marking, or ordering. Hudson's strong arguments for a non-transformational grammar stress the capacity of daughter-dependency theory to reflect the facts of language structure and to capture generalizations that transformational models miss. An important attraction of Hudson's theory is that the syntax is more concrete, with no abstract underlying elements. In the appendixes, the author outlines a partial grammar for English and a small lexicon and distinguishes his theory from standard dependency theory. Hudson's provocative thesis is supported by his thorough knowledge of transformational grammar.


Arguments for a Non-Transformational Grammar Related Books

Arguments for a Non-Transformational Grammar
Language: en
Pages: 228
Authors: Richard A. Hudson
Categories: Language Arts & Disciplines
Type: BOOK - Published: 1976-11 - Publisher: University of Chicago Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

For the past decade, the dominant transformational theory of syntax has produced the most interesting insights into syntactic properties. Over the same period a
Syntactic Structures
Language: en
Pages: 120
Authors: Noam Chomsky
Categories: Language Arts & Disciplines
Type: BOOK - Published: 2020-05-18 - Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

No detailed description available for "Syntactic Structures".
The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax
Language: en
Pages: 1412
Authors: Marcel den Dikken
Categories: Language Arts & Disciplines
Type: BOOK - Published: 2013-07-25 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Syntax – the study of sentence structure – has been at the centre of generative linguistics from its inception and has developed rapidly and in various dire
Grammatical theory
Language: en
Pages: 879
Authors: Stefan Müller
Categories: Language Arts & Disciplines
Type: BOOK - Published: - Publisher: Language Science Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book introduces formal grammar theories that play a role in current linguistic theorizing (Phrase Structure Grammar, Transformational Grammar/Government &
Empirical Linguistics
Language: en
Pages: 238
Authors: Geoffrey Sampson
Categories: Language Arts & Disciplines
Type: BOOK - Published: 2002-09-12 - Publisher: A&C Black

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Linguistics has become an empirical science again after several decades when it was preoccupied with speakers' hazy "intuitions" about language structure. With