Workers' Privacy

Workers' Privacy
Author :
Publisher : International Labour Organization
Total Pages : 292
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9221082512
ISBN-13 : 9789221082514
Rating : 4/5 (514 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Workers' Privacy by : International Labour Office

Download or read book Workers' Privacy written by International Labour Office and published by International Labour Organization. This book was released on 1992 with total page 292 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:


Workers' Privacy Related Books

Workers' Privacy
Language: en
Pages: 292
Authors: International Labour Office
Categories: AIDS (Disease)
Type: BOOK - Published: 1992 - Publisher: International Labour Organization

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Workers' Privacy: Testing in the workplace
Language: en
Pages: 380
Authors:
Categories: AIDS (Disease)
Type: BOOK - Published: 1993 - Publisher: International Labour Organization

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The third of three issues on workers' privacy in industrialized countries, this volume is devoted to testing of workers and job applicants to detect alcohol and
Privacy in a Digital, Networked World
Language: en
Pages: 419
Authors: Sherali Zeadally
Categories: Computers
Type: BOOK - Published: 2015-10-13 - Publisher: Springer

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This comprehensive textbook/reference presents a focused review of the state of the art in privacy research, encompassing a range of diverse topics. The first b
Privacy@work
Language: en
Pages: 668
Authors: Frank Hendrickx
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2023-06-12 - Publisher: Kluwer Law International B.V.

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The right to privacy is a fundamental right. Along with the related right to personal data protection, it has come to take a central place in contemporary emplo
Reasonable Expectations of Privacy?
Language: en
Pages: 392
Authors: Sjaak Nouwt
Categories: Computers
Type: BOOK - Published: 2005-07-28 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In 1967, Justice John Marshall Harlan introduced the litmus test of ‘a reasonable expectation of privacy’ in his concurring opinion in the US Supreme Court